top of page

Feeling mentally overloaded?

If you're navigating stress, competing tasks, or unclear priorities, start with the free Prioritisation Planning Grid, a 10-minute tool to clarify what genuinely needs your attention.

Search

How Smaller Goals Help Women Reduce Stress and Feel More in Control

  • Mar 24
  • 5 min read


There is a persistent assumption we humans tend to lean toward when it comes to improving our wellbeing; if progress is not being made, the underlying issue must be one of motivation, discipline, or commitment. And wellbeing advice often mirrors this, implying that with a better plan, stronger habits, or greater consistency, change would follow.


However, psychological research suggests a different explanation.


When the demands placed on an individual exceed what their cognitive system can comfortably manage, the difficulty is not a lack of effort but a reduction in processing capacity. In these conditions, the ability to prioritise, make decisions, and initiate action is reduced. What is often interpreted as hesitation or avoidance is, in many cases, the result of cognitive overload.


For many women, this context is not unusual but ongoing. Multiple roles, responsibilities, and expectations coexist, often without clear boundaries between them. In this environment, even the intention to improve wellbeing can feel difficult to translate into action, not because it is unimportant, but because it must compete with everything else already in place.



Cognitive Load Theory


When cognitive load is high, the brain does not simply “slow down.” It adapts by narrowing attention, simplifying decisions, and prioritising immediate or familiar responses over more effortful, reflective ones. This can lead to delays in decision-making, difficulty identifying a starting point, and a tendency to defer actions that require additional thought or planning.


These patterns are often misinterpreted as a lack of discipline or follow-through. In reality, they reflect the way cognitive systems operate under sustained demand. This distinction is important, because it shifts the question from “Why am I not doing this?” to “What conditions would make this easier to begin?”. Without this shift, many attempts to improve wellbeing inadvertently increase pressure. Introducing new routines, additional goals, or more structured plans can compound the existing load, making initiation even less likely.


A significant proportion of wellbeing guidance is built on the assumption that change requires expansion — more habits, more structure, more effort. While these approaches may be effective under low-demand conditions, they are often misaligned with the realities faced by individuals already operating at capacity.


From a cognitive perspective, adding complexity introduces more decision points, heightens internal competition among priorities, and amplifies the sense of being overwhelmed. Rather than creating clarity, it can create fragmentation.


This is why individuals frequently find themselves aware of what might helpyet unable to act on that awareness consistently or sustainably.


If the underlying issue is not motivation but capacity, then the starting point for change must be adjusted accordingly. Rather than increasing the volume of action, the focus shifts towards reducing cognitive load and creating conditions in which action becomes more manageable.



Self-Determination Theory


Self-Determination Theory provides a useful framework for understanding how this can be achieved. It proposes that sustained behaviour change and psychological wellbeing are supported when three basic needs are met: autonomy, competence, and relatedness. These needs function as foundational conditions for motivation, influencing not only whether individuals act, but also how sustainable those actions are over time.


In the context of cognitive overload, these needs are often compromised. Decisions feel externally driven rather than self-directed, actions feel difficult rather than achievable, and the process can feel isolating rather than supported.



Applying This in Practice


Reducing the scale of what is being attempted is not a compromise of ambition, but a recalibration of approach. When the scope of action is narrowed, several psychological processes begin to shift.


A smaller, self-selected focus supports autonomy by allowing the individual to engage with something that feels relevant and manageable within their current context. At the same time, the likelihood of successful follow-through increases, strengthening perceived competence. Importantly, limiting the number of competing demands reduces cognitive load, allowing for clearer thinking and more deliberate decision-making.


These changes do not occur in isolation. Together, they create a sense of traction that is often absent in more expansive approaches. Progress becomes visible, effort feels proportionate, and the experience of attempting change becomes less burdensome.


In practical terms, this approach is deliberately contained. Rather than attempting to address multiple areas simultaneously, the focus is on identifying a single point of change that aligns with both current priorities and available capacity.


This may involve selecting one area of wellbeing that would have a meaningful impact on the week ahead, defining one clear and achievable action within that area, and consciously allowing other potential changes to remain unaddressed for the time being.


The intention is not to minimise the importance of broader goals, but to remove the internal competition that often prevents any of them from being initiated.



What This Means for Women


For women navigating multiple roles and responsibilities, the expectation that improved wellbeing should be pursued through additional effort is often unrealistic. What is required instead is an approach that acknowledges existing demands and works within them.


When the starting point is adjusted to reflect cognitive capacity, rather than ideal conditions, the experience of change becomes more accessible. Decisions feel clearer, actions feel more achievable, and the process itself becomes more sustainable.


This is where the sense of being calm, clear, and in control begins to emerge — not as the result of doing more, but of approaching change differently.



A Practical Place to Start


A useful way to take steps is through a single, focused question:

What is one small shift that would make this week feel easier?


This question narrows attention, reduces complexity, and creates a starting point that is grounded in the individual’s current reality. It does not require a complete plan, only a clear next step.


For many, translating this approach into practice is easier within a structured environment that reduces the need for ongoing decision-making, builds a sense of relatedness, agency and competency.



Explore This Topic Further


If you want a structured, supportive space to apply these ideas in practice, the Women’s Wellbeing Lab offers psychology-informed tools designed to support improved wellbeing in real-life conditions.


Inside the Lab, you’ll find psychology-informed tools designed to help you understand what’s driving how you feel, organise competing demands, and respond with intention rather than reaction.


Bring this knowledge to your decision-making and coaching sessions to make faster progress toward your goals.




References

Comments

Start your 7-day free trial and get clear on what actually matters this week

Apply This in Real Life

Eyes Closed_edited.png

Reading about wellbeing is helpful — but change happens when you can reflect, adapt, and revisit ideas as life unfolds.

​

Inside the Women’s Wellbeing Lab, you’ll find tools and guided support to help you:

  • explore this topic in the context of your own life

  • decide what’s worth changing right now (and what isn’t)

  • take small, realistic steps without pressure or perfectionism

 

If this article resonated, the Lab gives you a place to work with it — not just read it.

Explore the Women’s Wellbeing Lab free for 7 days

bottom of page