top of page

Feeling mentally overloaded?

If you're navigating stress, competing tasks, or unclear priorities, start with the free Prioritisation Planning Grid, a 10-minute tool to clarify what genuinely needs your attention.

Search

Why Women Find It So Hard to Start (And What the Research Actually Says)

  • Apr 13
  • 5 min read

Updated: Apr 20


Women don’t struggle to start because of a lack of confidence. Research shows the real barrier is how risk, perfectionism, and social conditioning interact—making starting feel higher-stakes and less safe.


You know something needs to change. You've known it for a while. And yet every time you turn your attention to it — your health, your energy, the way you feel by Wednesday afternoon — you don't start.


You think about starting. You make a mental note to think about it more carefully when things calm down. And then life continues, exactly as it was.


This isn't avoidance. It isn't a lack of motivation. And it has nothing to do with not wanting it enough.


What's actually happening is more precise than that — and once you understand it, the barrier to beginning looks very different.

 


Your brain is already full before you even sit down


Women are disproportionately responsible for the cognitive labour of daily life. Not just the visible tasks (the planning, the decisions, the appointments, the logistics) but the invisible work that runs underneath all of it: anticipating what needs doing, identifying options, making decisions, monitoring whether anything has been missed. Research by Allison Daminger, published in the American Sociological Review, identified four distinct stages of this mental work: anticipating needs, identifying options, deciding between them, and monitoring outcomes, and found that mothers carried more of this load at every stage.


A 2023 systematic review published in Sex Roles (2023) confirmed what many women already feel: that carrying a disproportionate share of cognitive labour is consistently associated with emotional depletion and reduced well-being. The exhaustion isn't imagined. It has a structural cause.


And this matters when we talk about starting something new, because the brain you're trying to use to plan, motivate, and organise your next step is the same brain that has already been doing this work all day. Often all week. Sometimes for years without a break that counted.

 


The over-planning trap


When energy is reduced, the brain doesn't simply slow down. It makes a specific kind of error: it demands more information before it will act.


Educational psychologist John Sweller developed Cognitive Load Theory in the 1980s to explain how working memory, the part of the mind responsible for active thinking, reasoning, and decision-making, operates under strict capacity limits. Working memory can only process around four pieces of information at once. When it becomes overloaded, cognitive performance deteriorates. What was manageable feels impossible. What was simple feels complicated.


The result, when you're already running low, is that starting anything begins to feel like it requires a complete plan first. You need to research the right approach. You need to find the time. You need to feel ready. And so you gather more information, consider more options, and end up, as researchers describe it, in a state of analysis paralysis: a loop of over-evaluation that produces no action at all.


Roy Baumeister and Kathleen Vohs have documented this in research on decision fatigue, showing that the more decisions a person makes, the more their capacity for subsequent decision-making deteriorates.


One consequence, as Sjastad and Baumeister found, is that decision-fatigued individuals become less willing to plan and more likely to avoid action entirely. Not because they don't care, but because the cognitive cost of initiating something new has become, temporarily, too high.


This isn't a character flaw. It's a neurological reality. And it's worth knowing, because it means the waiting-until-you-have-a-proper-plan feeling is not a signal that you need a better plan. It's a signal that your working memory is overloaded. More information is not the solution, whereas a smaller step is.

 


Clarity doesn't come before the first step. It comes from it.


There's a widely held assumption that you need to know what you're doing before you do it. That the right starting point will reveal itself through sufficient research, reflection, or the arrival of the right moment.


The evidence suggests otherwise.


Psychologist Albert Bandura spent decades studying what actually predicts whether people act on their intentions. His research found that the single most powerful source of what he called self-efficacy — a person's belief in their own capacity to succeed — is mastery experience: the direct experience of doing something and finding that you can. Not planning it. Not reading about it. Doing it, however imperfectly.


In Bandura's framework, self-efficacy isn't something you build before you act. It's something that grows through acting. Each small, completed step shifts your internal sense of what's possible. And that shift — not the perfect plan — is what produces the momentum to continue.


This means that an imperfect first step is not a failed start. It is, precisely, how starting works. The woman who goes for a ten-minute walk when she had planned an hour, who writes one sentence when she had planned a page, who books a single appointment when she had been waiting until everything lined up — she has not fallen short. She has done the thing that actually changes things.


You don't need to be ready. You don't need the right conditions. One small, imperfect action is enough to begin, because beginning is what creates the conditions for what comes next.



The right support reduces the load, it doesn't add to it


Knowing that reduced energy and cognitive overload are what make starting feel impossible is useful. But knowing something and being able to act on it are two different things and that gap is exactly where most good intentions quietly disappear.


If you're choosing tools, resources, or support to help you move forward, look for things that reduce the number of decisions you have to make, not add to them. That means structure that's already been thought through for you, practical starting points that are small enough to be realistic, and, where possible, human support that removes the invisible weight of having to figure everything out alone.


Women who work through change in a supported, structured environment consistently report less self-questioning and more follow-through. Not because they're different from women who go it alone, but because not doing it alone genuinely changes the cognitive experience of starting.


The first step doesn't have to be the right one. It just has to be the next one.



Explore This Topic Further


If you want a structured, supportive space to apply these ideas in practice, the Women's Wellbeing Lab offers psychology-informed tools designed to support improved wellbeing in real-life conditions.


Inside the Lab, you'll find psychology-informed tools designed to help you understand what's driving how you feel, organise competing demands, and respond with intention rather than reaction.


Bring this knowledge to your decision-making and coaching sessions to make faster progress toward your goals.




References

Comments

Start your 7-day free trial and get clear on what actually matters this week

Apply This in Real Life

Eyes Closed_edited.png

Reading about wellbeing is helpful — but change happens when you can reflect, adapt, and revisit ideas as life unfolds.

​

Inside the Women’s Wellbeing Lab, you’ll find tools and guided support to help you:

  • explore this topic in the context of your own life

  • decide what’s worth changing right now (and what isn’t)

  • take small, realistic steps without pressure or perfectionism

 

If this article resonated, the Lab gives you a place to work with it — not just read it.

Explore the Women’s Wellbeing Lab free for 7 days

bottom of page