Why Chronic Stress Stops Women Moving Forward

Most conversations about stress focus on how it feels. This one focuses on what it does — specifically, how sustained chronic stress affects the cognitive, emotional, and physical resources that women need to act on what they already know would help. This article explains why the women who most need to invest in their well-being are often those with the least to invest.

In this article:

• Why you know what would help and cannot make yourself begin

• Why women carry more stress demand than men — and recover from it less

• Why being ill, stretched across care, or in a senior role makes this harder still

• Why the guilt about not acting is making it worse

• Why trying harder is not the answer — and what the evidence suggests instead

What Chronic Stress Is Actually Doing

Stress is typically understood as something felt. Pressure, tension, a sense of too much happening at once. What research makes clear is that chronic stress — stress that is sustained rather than occasional — does something more specific and more measurable than that.

The concept of allostatic load, first described by McEwen and Stellar (1993), captures what happens when the body's stress response systems remain activated over time. Rather than returning to baseline after a stressor passes, sustained exposure causes progressive dysregulation across multiple physiological systems: neuroendocrine, immune, metabolic, and cardiovascular. The cumulative effect of this dysregulation is what researchers refer to as allostatic load — the measurable, physiological cost of chronic stress on the body and on cognitive function (Juster, McEwen and Lupien, 2010).

This matters beyond the physical. A systematic review and meta-analysis by D'Amico et al. (2020) found a significant association between higher allostatic load and poorer performance in global cognition and executive function—the cognitive processes that govern planning, decision-making, and the initiation of action. These are not peripheral functions. They are the exact processes required to recognise that something needs to change and to take deliberate steps toward it.

In practical terms, this means that chronic stress does not simply affect how a woman feels from day to day. It measurably affects her capacity to act on what she knows. The exhaustion that sits underneath everything else is not a mood. It has a a meaningful physiological basis.

Why the Women Who Most Need to Act Have the Least Energy to Do So

Understanding what chronic stress does physiologically is one part of the picture. The other is understanding what it does to the resources required for change.

Conservation of Resources Theory, developed by Hobfoll (1989), proposes that psychological stress occurs when the resources a person needs — cognitive, emotional, physical, and social — are threatened, lost, or insufficient to meet demands. Resources here are not abstract. They include the energy, attentional capacity, sense of agency, and emotional regulation that deliberate action depends on.

The theory identifies a mechanism that is particularly relevant for women managing sustained, multi-directional demands: the loss spiral. When resources are insufficient to begin with, the investment required to cope with stressors may be enough to produce further losses. In other words, the more depleted a person's resource base becomes, the harder it is to mobilise what remains — and the more any attempt to act costs. Those with fewer resources are more vulnerable to resource loss, less capable of resource gain, and more likely to conserve what remains rather than risk further depletion.

This is the mechanism that sits underneath the experience of knowing what would help and being unable to begin. It is not avoidance. It is not a lack of commitment. It is a predictable consequence of a depleted resource base responding to ongoing demand — and it is compounded, not relieved, by self-criticism, which itself draws on the same cognitive and emotional reserves.

Who This Affects — and Why the Demand Is Not Distributed Equally

Conservation of Resources Theory applies to anyone experiencing sustained stress, but the resource depletion it describes does not fall equally across the population. For working-age women in particular, the structure of daily demand — across professional, domestic, and care contexts simultaneously — creates conditions in which resource loss is both more likely and harder to recover from.

Research published in The Lancet Public Health (Remes et al., 2022) identified what it describes as role strain: the condition that arises when the combination of paid work and a high unpaid workload produces role conflict and role overload, triggering stress-related pathways that measurably affect psychological wellbeing. Critically, the drivers of both role strain and time poverty are, as the authors note, highly gendered — women are routinely and differentially exposed to a double burden of paid and unpaid work in ways that men are not.

This pattern is not uniform across all women's lives, but it intensifies at several identifiable points.

• Women with children carry a disproportionate share of domestic and care coordination, regardless of employment status. Research consistently shows that the "second shift" — the unpaid domestic and care work undertaken after paid working hours — contributes to higher levels of stress and lower levels of mental health among women, and limits the possibility of fully engaging in paid work. OECD

• Women with bidirectional care responsibilities — caring simultaneously for dependent children and for aging or unwell adults — face what researchers call the sandwich generation burden. Among sandwich caregivers, 62% are women and 38% are men, and women are more likely than men to report negative impacts of caregiving on health, wellbeing, finances, and family relationships. The resource depletion this creates is compounded: not only are resources consumed by two directions of care demand, but the emotional and cognitive labour involved in coordinating that care is itself a significant and largely invisible cost. OECD

• Women in senior professional roles face an additional layer that is rarely accounted for in workplace wellbeing frameworks. Research published in the Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology (Gardiner et al., 1999) found that women in male-dominated industries reported worse mental health outcomes associated with their leadership roles, with gender and industry gender ratio both influencing stress experience. The cognitive load of navigating professional environments while also managing care responsibilities outside work — without the structural support that typically accompanies equivalent roles held by men — represents a form of sustained multi-directional demand that the allostatic load model predicts will have measurable physiological consequences over time.

• Women managing physical or reproductive health transitions — including perimenopause, which carries significant cognitive, psychological, and sleep-related symptom burden from as early as age 30 — do so against a backdrop of reduced recovery opportunity. Research indicates that when women are unwell, the domestic and care demands around them largely continue, while men in equivalent circumstances report greater practical and emotional support at home.

The role-strain hypothesis — also referred to as the depletion or scarcity hypothesis — proposes that an increased number of roles leads to overload and strain, and that maintenance across multiple roles can create stressful conflict that results in adverse psychological and physiological outcomes. For women managing professional, parental, caring, and domestic roles concurrently, this is not a hypothetical framework. It describes an ordinary week.

What Conservation of Resources Theory adds to this picture is the loss spiral: the mechanism by which depleted resources make further depletion more likely. Those with fewer resources are more vulnerable to resource loss, less capable of resource gain, and highly risk-averse — often opting to maintain existing resources rather than risk further depletion. For women already operating across multiple high-demand roles, this means that the capacity to invest in their own wellbeing — the very thing that would interrupt the cycle — is precisely what the cycle consumes first.

Why Self-Blame Makes It Worse

There is a particular cruelty to the experience of knowing what would help, being unable to begin, and then interpreting that as a personal failing. It is worth being specific about what self-criticism does — not as a moral observation, but as a physiological one.

Research by Gilbert (2009, 2014) in the development of Compassion Focused Therapy identifies self-criticism as a process that continuously activates the threat and protection system — the same system involved in detecting and responding to danger. According to Gilbert's model, highly self-critical individuals continuously activate the threat and protection system while suppressing the contentment system, meaning that, when faced with failure, disappointment, or perceived inadequacy, the physiological response mirrors that of an external threat.  The body does not distinguish between a stressor in the environment and a stressor generated from within.

This has a direct consequence for resource depletion. Post-stress rumination — the tendency to mentally revisit and self-evaluate following a stressor — has been shown to amplify and prolong the cortisol stress response. Research published in Psychoneuroendocrinology (Zoccola et al., 2014) found that state rumination significantly mediated the link between major stressors and elevated cortisol levels, as well as steeper reactivity and slower recovery. Post-stress rumination may inhibit coping, decrease habituation of the HPA axis stress response, and increase allostatic load over time.  

In the context of Conservation of Resources Theory, this matters considerably. Self-criticism and rumination are not passive experiences — they are cognitively and physiologically costly. They draw on the same depleted cognitive and emotional reserves that intentional action requires, while simultaneously amplifying the stress response already consuming them. The woman who tells herself she should have done something by now is not motivating herself. She is adding another demand to an already overstretched system.

Research consistently identifies self-criticism as a transdiagnostic construct — one that predicts increases in depression and anxiety symptoms over time,  and which, within the framework of Hobfoll's loss spiral, functions as an internal stressor that accelerates resource loss without contributing to resource replenishment.

What This Means Practically for Women

The research reviewed in the preceding sections points to a consistent and important implication: the appropriate response to resource depletion is not increased effort. Effort is itself a resource expenditure. For a woman operating within a loss spiral — where depleted resources make further depletion more likely — the expectation that she should simply try harder, commit more fully, or find motivation she does not currently have misunderstands the mechanism entirely.

Conservation of Resources Theory offers a more accurate framework. Gain spirals work in the opposite direction to loss spirals: those who experience resource gains are in a better position to gain further resources, and are therefore likely to experience increasing levels of resource gain over time. The implication is that interrupting a loss spiral does not require a large intervention. It requires an initial resource gain sufficient to shift the trajectory. Small, structured, low-demand inputs — those that build cognitive, emotional, or social resources without first requiring a significant expenditure of them — are theoretically the most appropriate starting point for someone already operating at the lower end of their resource reserve.

This is not a consolation prize framing of low-intensity support. It is what the evidence predicts. Research reviewing wellbeing interventions found that brief, light-touch, or self-directed approaches may be equally as effective as more intensive, lengthy, or in-person interventions — a finding that has direct relevance for women whose primary barrier to engaging with support is not motivation or interest, but available resource.

The question, then, is not whether a woman needs to invest in her own wellbeing. The preceding sections have made clear that the cost of not doing so accumulates measurably over time. The question is what kind of starting point is actually appropriate given where she is — and whether the support available to her is designed with her resource constraints in mind, or designed for someone with capacity she does not currently have.

Where to Start

The research in this article points toward a clear sequence: recognise that the exhaustion is not a character flaw. It is the documented, measurable consequence of sustained multi-directional demand on a depleted resource base.

Approach that recognition with self-compassion rather than self-criticism; the evidence is clear that harsh self-evaluation amplifies the stress response and depletes the same resources that intentional action requires.

Find support that is designed for where you actually are — not for a version of yourself with more capacity, more time, or a less demanding life.

That means looking for something:

• Structured enough to be useful

• Low-pressure enough to be sustainable

• Accessible enough to fit into a real life, not an imagined one, with more space in it

The Women's Wellbeing Lab is for women who recognise that their own wellbeing matters — not because they have reached crisis, and not because they have found a window of spare time, but because they understand that waiting for either of those things is itself part of the cycle the research describes.

---

Explore This Topic Further

If you want a structured, supportive space to apply these ideas in practice, the Women's Wellbeing Lab offers psychology-informed tools designed to improve wellbeing in real-life settings.

Inside the Lab, you'll find psychology-informed tools designed to help you understand what's driving how you feel, organise competing demands, and respond with intention rather than reaction.

Bring this knowledge to your decision-making and coaching sessions to make faster progress toward your goals.

Explore the Women's Wellbeing Lab

---

References

• McEwen, B.S. and Stellar, E. (1993). Stress and the individual: Mechanisms leading to disease. Archives of Internal Medicine, 153(18), 2093–2101.

• Juster, R.P., McEwen, B.S. and Lupien, S.J. (2010). Allostatic load biomarkers of chronic stress and impact on health and cognition. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 35(1), 2–16.

• D'Amico, D., Amestoy, M.E. and Fiocco, A.J. (2020). The association between allostatic load and cognitive function: A systematic and meta-analytic review. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 121, 104849.

• Hobfoll, S.E. (1989). Conservation of resources: A new attempt at conceptualizing stress. American Psychologist, 44(3), 513–524.

• Hobfoll, S.E. (2011). Conservation of resources theory: Its implication for stress, health, and resilience. In S. Folkman (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Stress, Health, and Coping. Oxford University Press.

• Remes, O., Mendes, J.F. and Templeton, P. (2022). Gender differences in the association between unpaid labour and mental health in employed adults: A systematic review. The Lancet Public Health, 7(9), e786–e796.

• OECD (2025). Gender Equality in a Changing World: Persistent Gender Gaps in Paid and Unpaid Work. OECD Publishing.

• Gardiner, M. and Tiggemann, M. (1999). Gender differences in leadership style, job stress and mental health in male- and female-dominated industries. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 72(3), 301–315.

• Simons, M.A. and Shepherd, S. (2015). Stress and the multiple-role woman: Taking a closer look at the superwoman. PLOS One, 10(3), e0120952.

• Harma, M., Ropponen, A., Hakola, T., Koskinen, A., Vanttola, P., Puttonen, S., Sallinen, M. and Kivimäki, M. (2017). The mediating role of recovery opportunities on future sickness absence from a gender and age-sensitive perspective. PLOS One, 12(7), e0181664.

• Crandall, A., Bettencourt, A., Osypuk, T., Seltzer, J.A. and Margerison, C. (2025). Perimenopause symptoms, severity, and healthcare seeking in women in the US. npj Women's Health, 3, 12.

• National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (2024). Advancing Research on Chronic Conditions in Women. The National Academies Press.

• Vart, P., Powe, N.R., McCulloch, C.E., Saran, R., Gillespie, B.W., Morgenstern, H. and Crews, D.C. (2021). Do work and home-related demands and resources differ between women and men during return to work? PLOS One, 16(6), e0253049.

• Gilbert, P. (2009). The Compassionate Mind. Constable.

• Gilbert, P. (2014). The origins and nature of compassion focused therapy. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 53(1), 6–41.

• Zoccola, P.M., Figueroa, W.S., Rabideau, E.M. and Interior, K. (2014). State rumination links major life stressors to acute stressor cortisol response in healthy adults. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 49, 158–166.

• McCredie, M.N. and Morey, L.C. (2018). The role of self-criticism in common mental health difficulties in students: A systematic review of prospective studies. Counselling Psychology Quarterly, 32(3–4), 1–16.

• Patel, N., Crabtree, S., Crabtree, B. and Stults, C. (2024). Interventions to promote resilience and passion for work in health settings: A mixed-methods systematic review. ScienceDirect.